But can Eliot Spitzer do a back hand spring?

One of the pleasures of Sunday morning is walking to the end of the driveway (even in rain, like yesterday) to fetch the papers, which include the local Morning Call and the Sunday New York Times. It’s a treat to lay the papers out on the bed and read while sipping especially delicious coffee. Time seems to stand still while I page through the paper, confident that there are hours between this pleasure and officially ticking off the commitments of the day. Sometimes, I cheat. On a Saturday evening I’ll peek at a few stories from next day’s paper on my i-phone. I did that last night when I started to read the story about Governor Jan Brewer’s decision to inact immigration reform in Arizona. It wasn’t the issue that caught my eye as much as how the governor is described in the story.

The article reads: “To the public, Ms. Brewer, 65, is a smiling, deeply tanned, affable “cheerleader type,” as one friend described her. She may fumble and grimace her way through news conferences, but she genuinely likes shaking constituents’ hands and startling state employees on field visits by chatting them up.” That she is more public relations director than savvy politico is the impression left on the reader. This may all be true, but it seems especially harsh on a day when an article about disgraced Eliot Spitzer’s opinion on the governing ability of Andrew Cuomo is given an especially noteworthy placement. No reference to Mr. Spitzer’s skin tone or any other markers of his appearance are mentioned, except to say he was “zealous” or “overzealous (some would say).”

We have a dearth of women political leaders in the United States and one reason may well be the unfair media treatment they repeatedly receive. The slight to cheerleaders is also noted. I’d like to see Eliot Spitzer do a back handspring. Without his socks on.

More women governors will lead to Madam President

Why don’t more women governors become presidential candidates?  Barbara Lee, president of the Barbara Lee Foundation created a guide, titled “Keys to the Governor’s Office” to help women running for governor.  At first, her interest was on women and the presidency, but she notes that “as I understood more about the paths to power, it was clear that electing a woman president would become a reality only after we unraveled voters’ complex reactions to a woman seeking full executive authority.”

Marie Wilson, president of The White House Project also notes the importance of the role of governor to increase women’s participation on the national stage.  “Look at governors from large states,” she told me when contemplating who may win the presidency.  Brenda DeVore Marshall and Molly A. Mayhead, editors of Navigating Boundaries:  The Rhetoric of Women Governors, note, “the increasing importance of the state governor throughout the history of the country, coupled with women’s steadily expanding role in the office, demonstrates that the face of leadership has changed.  It also indicated that examining the women who are governors in America would be a good place to start when identifying women most likely to make successful bids for the presidency.  But that doesn’t seem  the case and it begs the question:  “Why don’t more women governors run for president?”

Currently, there are six women governors.  Jennifer Granholm of Michigan is out because of her Canadian birth.  Still, of the five women governors eligible for the presidency, rarely do we hear of them as contenders.  They include Linda Lingle, Republican of Hawaii, who like Democrat Chris Gregoire have won two terms and enjoy high approval ratings.  M. Jodi Rell, Republican governor of Connecticut has announced her retirement.  Other governors include the newly elected Beverly Perdue, Democrat of North Carolina and Jan Brewer who as secretary of state of Arizona was next in line to succeed Janet Napolitano when she became Secretary of Homeland Security.  Though a small cadre, it begs the question:  why don’t the names of these women don’t come up when presidential politics are discussed? 

Is the rough media treatment of women candidates a deterrent?  Are women who would otherwise plunge into presidential politics thinking twice when they consider the sexist media treatment of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin?

Communication scholar Erika Falk, notes in her book Women for President:  Media Bias in Eight Campaigns  that “if women have a negatively skewed  impression of their chances of winning they may be less likely to run, and this may be the most important and worrisome potential outcome of press  coverage of women.”

Governorships are the surest paths to the presidency.   When we elect more women governors and more women governors become presidential candidates then a woman president will be more likely.

 Nichola D. Gutgold is associate professor of communication arts and sciences at Penn State Lehigh Valley and author of Almost Madam President:  Why Hillary Clinton ‘won’ in 2008 (Lexington Books, 2009).